In re Ciara H.

The district court entered a jeopardy order based on a finding that jeopardy had been established by Mother's inadequate care and supervision of Child. During the pendency of Mother's appeal, Child turned eighteen years old. Although the appeal was moot, the Supreme Court reached the merits of the appeal because of potential collateral consequences. The Court then (1) concluded that the evidence did not establish parental unfitness to support a jeopardy order and, (2) while the jeopardy order itself was moot, vacated the court's order and the findings that supported the order and remanded with direction to vacate the jeopardy order and dismiss the child protection proceedings against Child.